The disclosures
According to Iranian media reports, high-resolution satellite imagery has exposed extensive damage across multiple Israeli military installations following operations by Iran and Hezbollah, raising serious questions about the scale of destruction being shielded from public view by Tel Aviv.
An analysis of satellite data published by the Australian geospatial firm Soar demonstrates direct hits on several military bases inside Israeli territory during Iran's recent offensive, codenamed "Operation True Promise 4." These actions were launched in retaliation for the US-Israeli air campaign initiated on February 28. That joint offensive began with targeted airstrikes that assassinated senior Iranian officials, including the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, while also targeting civilian infrastructure. Iran responded by unleashing devastating counter-strikes against US and Israeli forward operating bases and strategic assets throughout the theater of operations.
Media blackout covers up damage
A report by the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, published on Friday under strict military censorship clearance, utilized low-quality imagery—a move that has intensified skepticism regarding the regime's transparency concerning the actual scale of damage it sustained.
Independent imagery obtained from the Sentinel-2 satellite reveals that the Ramat David airbase was struck in two separate areas. According to the structural analysis, one blast zone contained support vehicles and logistics equipment, while the second served as a critical refueling and maintenance node for frontline fighter aircraft—a vital component of Israel's aerial operational capacity.
Hit on Unit 8200
The satellite data also captures a sudden structural disruption near an intelligence building within the Mishar base, a primary signals intelligence facility operated by Unit 8200 near Safed. The analysis provided by Soar points to a successful strike occurring against the military installation between March 5 and March 10.
Damage at Nevatim airbase
Additional satellite reconnaissance confirms visible damage to an established position within the Nevatim airbase, with the impact scars becoming clearly discernible by March 25. The strategic airbase was a priority target during Iran's retaliatory surge against the US-led coalition campaign.
Hezbollah's drone swarms
Concurrently, the imagery reveals a massive fire at Camp Shimshon that broke out on March 10, coinciding precisely with Hezbollah's announcement that it had targeted the facility utilizing a coordinated swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles. According to the investigation, the drone swarm attack sparked a blaze that burned unchecked for several days, spreading across a 200-meter perimeter inside the base. Comparisons with historical high-resolution imagery from 2016, 2024, and 2025 confirmed that the affected sector was consistently used for operational purposes, including military vehicle staging and logistics preparation. The analysis notes that older imagery showed no significant vegetation in the area, indicating that the fire was sparked by a direct hit on vital infrastructure rather than burning brushwood.
670 missiles and 765 drones
The deliberate degradation of image quality by Israeli military censors strongly indicates that authorities are actively attempting to minimize the perceived efficacy of Iran's strike options. Since the outbreak of the unprovoked hostilities, Iran has launched approximately 670 ballistic missiles and 765 kamikaze drones toward Israeli territory, according to figures cited by Yedioth Ahronoth. Against this backdrop, the Israeli military establishment remains deeply concerned that ballistic missile capabilities have been excluded from the core agenda of the permanent ceasefire talks between Iran and the US. The broader conflict has been frozen since April 8, when a ceasefire brokered by Pakistan took effect. Meanwhile, the Israeli regime is reportedly pressuring the United States to initiate a new round of warfare against Iran, given that the preceding campaigns of June 2025 and February 2026 failed to achieve their stated objectives.
Americans assess heavy material losses
The 40-day war with Iran did not turn out to be a "short and decisive campaign," but instead devolved into a strategic and financial quagmire costing the Pentagon at least $29 billion. With American forces tallying the loss of 42 aircraft—including advanced F-35A Lightning II and F-15E Strike Eagle fighters—and the destruction of high-value ground radars tied to the THAAD anti-ballistic missile network, Washington is confronting the harsh reality of asymmetricwarfare.
Shock congressional report released
The US lost up to 42 aircraft (including 18 manned airframes) during the hostilities with Iran, according to a newly declassified congressional report. While the American military suffered severe attrition across its fixed-wing fleet, Israel's airframe losses were negligible, confined primarily to low-speed surveillance drones. The US air force lost six frontline combat jets, including four F-15E Strike Eagles, one F-35A, and one A-10 Thunderbolt II. Within its support and reconnaissance fleets, the US lost seven KC-135 aerial refueling tankers, one E-3 Sentry AWACS, two MC-130J special operations transports, and an MQ-4C Triton maritime surveillance drone.
Washington also lost rotary and unmanned assets, including an HH-60W Combat Rescue Helicopter and 24 MQ-9 Reaper drones. Three Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawks were also reported damaged by Iranian ground fire while conducting combat search and rescue (CSAR) operations for downed F-15 crews. These Black Hawks were omitted from the official congressional text. Beyond aviation assets, Iran successfully targeted several high-value US ground radars integrated into the THAAD anti-ballistic system, alongside early-warning radar arrays. These radar losses were similarly excluded from the congressional summary.
Iranian strikes on US aircraft in flight
The Iranian Air Force was largely grounded or destroyed during the opening phases of the joint US-Israeli air campaign. However, while a significant portion of Iran's integrated air defense network was neutralized, sufficient mobile systems survived to actively engage adversarial aircraft. Facing powerful US radar-jamming capabilities and Israeli electronic countermeasures, Iran relied heavily on infrared search and track (IRST systems) for passive tracking, alongside infrared-guided (IR) surface-to-air missiles to down target aircraft. The MQ-9 and Heron platforms represented subsonic, low-speed targets that were easily engaged.
The fact that an F-35 stealth fighter was successfully tracked and countered suggests that Iran successfully deployed its advanced, mobile Chinese-built YLC-8B and YLC-8E UHF 3D surveillance radars, which are optimized for low-observable target detection. Iran may have also benefited from real-time orbital intelligence provided by Russian satellite constellations, which frequently tracked aircraft vectors in transit.
Iranian strikes on US radars and communications
During the first four days of the war, Iran launched saturation strikes against virtually every US military base or dual-use facility hosting American deployment in the Persian Gulf. Video and satellite analysis shows that multiple impacts successfully neutralized key radar and communication nodes. Specifically, at the Al-Jufair base in Bahrain, two radomes were destroyed by Shahed-2 drones. According to US journalistic sources, these radomes housed AN/GSC-52B SATCOM satellite communication systems.
In the United Arab Emirates, an impact zone within Al Dhafra Air Base destroyed an area previously housing multiple satellite dishes. Simultaneously, it remains unconfirmed whether an AN/TPY-2 radar array, a core component of the THAAD anti-ballistic missile battery stationed at Al Ruwais, sustained permanent damage. In Kuwait, alongside structural damage to facilities at Ali Al Salem Air Base linked to SATCOM infrastructure, at least three radar domes were obliterated at Camp Arifjan.
At least one direct hit was recorded at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia, targeting a sector utilized for satellite communications where an AN/TPY-2 radar had been deployed. The massive AN/FPS-132 upgraded early warning radar (UEWR), a long-range anti-ballistic fixed AESA array situated at the US hub in Al Udeid, Qatar, also appears to have sustained damage.
Certain satellite images circulating online display visual inconsistencies that prevent definitive validation. Iranian sources also claim damage to another AN/TPY-2 node at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, though no independent imagery currently corroborates this assertion. The majority of these strikes against high-value radar installations, aerial tankers, and AEW&C assets were executed using ballistic missiles or low-cost Shahed loitering munitions valued at approximately $50,000 per unit.
Iran's 'Mosaic' defense strategy
Iran’s "Mosaic Defense" (Defa-e Mozaiki) is a decentralized military doctrine designed to survive leadership decapitation strikes and sustain long-term asymmetric resistance by dividing the country into 31 autonomous provincial commands. This setup removes dependency on a centralized command structure in Tehran, empowering localized units to operate independently, maintain administrative autonomy, and execute retaliatory operations.
Key aspects include decentralized command-and-control, which was formalized by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) around 2008. This strategy ensures that if one "tile" (province) is neutralized or loses communications, the remaining sectors continue fighting. Each of Iran's 31 provinces functions as an independent cell equipped with its own organic armaments, intelligence gathering capabilities, and logistics support, fully authorized to wage war without central guidance.
By distributing command away from Tehran, the system ensures that the conflict cannot be brought to an end via a single strategic strike, converting any foreign intervention into a protracted war of attrition. The strategy integrates the Basij militia for urban warfare and local defense. The doctrine leverages Iran’s rugged topography, including mountain ranges and expansive deserts, to form natural defensive fortresses that complicate conventional occupation. This operational framework was engineered specifically to counter a US or Israeli "Shock and Awe" campaign, prioritizing long-term attrition over conventional engagement.
What went wrong with the US air strategy
The US-led aerial strategy against Iran ran into significant hurdles, despite initial expectations of a rapid conventional victory. While the opening phase succeeded in degrading fixed air defenses and command facilities, the campaign suffered severe operational setbacks as the conflict dragged on. The US systematically underestimated Iranian defensive resilience and mobile tactics.
While official briefings initially claimed that Iran’s integrated air defense system had been entirely neutralized, this assertion proved inaccurate. A CNN report suggested that Tehran managed to keep up to 50% of its mobile missile launchers and drone assets completely intact. Furthermore, Iranian forces successfully concealed mobile air defense systems within extensive underground tunnel networks and hardened bunkers, enabling them to launch deadly ambushes against US aircraft. This shattered the assumption of a one-sided conflict and proved that the concept of a "Swift War" had failed. The strategy had relied on the premise that a massive, high-intensity air campaign would force a rapid regime collapse or a quick diplomatic concession.
This failed because Iranian asymmetric capabilities endured and executed direct counter-strikes, turning the campaign into a grinding war of attrition. Iran's broader strategy revolves around a doctrine of "forward defense," designed to project power across the Middle East while avoiding a direct, conventional clash on its own territory.
By leveraging regional proxy forces, investing in low-cost drone technology, and threatening the strategic Strait of Hormuz, Tehran successfully challenges US-Israeli regional influence while maintaining an elusive deterrent. Crucially, it demonstrated the capacity to retaliate directly against American forward bases. Iran successfully targeted US military installations throughout the theater, including facilities in Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, and Iraq, inflicting notable asset losses. This proved that American aerial supremacy did not guarantee security on the ground.
The Iranian drone fleet
Tehran relies heavily on low-cost, domestically manufactured drones like the Shahed series, which cost between $20,000 and $50,000, to oversaturate sophisticated, multi-million-dollar air defense networks via asymmetric saturation tactics. Iran has simultaneously cultivated tighter military-industrial ties with Russia, supplying loitering munitions in exchange for advanced technologies, including the S-400 surface-to-air missile system.
Iran projects regional influence through a network of proxies in unstable states, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) in Iraq, and the Houthi movement in Yemen, effectively shifting the physical conflict away from its own borders. Iran utilizes the IRGC to threaten international oil supply chains. This manifested as a calculated, selective blockade in the Gulf, permitting specific commercial shipping to pass while aggressively targeting vessels linked to the US, Israel, and their coalition allies. Tehran has issued explicit warnings that it will strike US and Israeli assets, including civilian infrastructure in host nations, if its own domestic power plants or energy installations are targeted.
Repeating historical miscalculations
The US repeated structural errors from prior conflicts (such as Afghanistan and Iraq) by relying exclusively on aerial destruction without establishing a coherent, viable political strategy for the day after to replace the targeted regime. Despite the neutralization of several top-tier commanders, a powerful "rally-around-the-flag" effect took hold.
The extensive bombing campaign, which resulted in the collateral destruction of dual-use civilian infrastructure, yielded counterproductive results. It unified the Iranian populace behind the government, neutralized potential domestic opposition movements, and solidified the political standing of hardline factions. Corporate and logistical resource constraints quickly became apparent. The high-intensity conflict rapidly depleted US precision munitions stocks, including high-value assets like Tomahawk cruise missiles and Patriot interceptor missiles, creating dangerous supply deficits in other critical theaters such as Europe and East Asia. Crucially, the majority of NATO members refused to participate in the campaign or assist in munition replenishment.
The miscalculation of diplomatic and escalation risks was stark. The strategy failed to deter regional escalation and instead prompted Iran to target global economic choke points, including energy infrastructure in the Gulf, driving up anti-American sentiment globally.
Technology is not a guarantee of victory
In summary, the coalition strategy faltered because it operated on the assumption that absolute technological superiority would automatically translate into a rapid political victory, failing to foresee the structural survivability of Iranian defense systems and the geopolitical fallout of widespread destruction. The stark disparity in aircraft losses between the US and Israel is not a reflection of inferior American technology or pilot competency. Rather, it stems from fundamentally different basing postures, operational exposure, and strategic approaches to the conflict.
The US operates from a network of massive, centralized forward bases across the Gulf. This meant that high-value assets—including AWACS, aerial tankers, radar nodes (such as the AN/TPY-2 linked to THAAD), and parked aircraft—were initially exposed or only partially sheltered. Iran exploited this vulnerability by deploying ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and low-cost Shahed drone swarms to saturate these bases during the opening hours of the war.
In contrast, Israel operates primarily from its heavily fortified home territory, where aircraft and critical systems benefit from hardened underground shelters, dispersed parking protocols, and one of the densest, most advanced layered air defense networks in the world.
Furthermore, the US shouldered the primary operational burden of the air war against Iran, which explains its significantly higher exposure to Iranian counter-strikes. Initial coordination challenges with Gulf host nations, some of which lacked recent high-intensity combat experience, contributed to operational friction, including the initial loss of three F-15E jets to friendly fire incidents over Kuwait.
Israel focused on high-precision standoff strikes, minimizing the physical exposure of its manned aircraft over highly contested airspace. The Israeli Air Force relied heavily on long-range standoff munitions, advanced electronic warfare, and unmanned systems for high-risk missions—accepting the predictable loss of expendable drones rather than risking human crews.
Israel has existed in a state of near-continuous operational readiness for decades. Its military possesses deep institutional expertise in operating against integrated air defense systems (IADS) in heavily contested environments. For Israel, this translated into highly conservative mission planning, superior integration of deception tactics, and advanced suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD), effectively minimizing risk to its core personnel.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών