According to the scenario predicted by the authorities, the victory of Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League final led to scenes of rare violence in Paris and across France. The images circulating on social media capture a situation spiraling out of control, a fact confirmed by official data on police interventions. However, politicians from the Left to the center are seeking to downplay the situation at all costs, while fundamental questions arise: are we still at the stage of simple "disturbances of public order," or are we facing a collapse of civilization?
A familiar scenario
The Champions League final pitted the French team Paris Saint-Germain against the English team Arsenal. While the match was held in Budapest in a relatively calm atmosphere, in Paris, residents held their breath and locked themselves in their homes. Families instructed children and teenagers to stay home—there was not even a thought of risking a trip to a cafe to watch the game, with the danger of getting involved. PSG took the victory again, but the result was far from glorious. Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez reported a sharp increase in violence.
Over 890 arrests were recorded, 178 police officers and gendarmes were injured, and two deaths have been reported. Speaking to radio station France Inter on Monday, June 1, he stated that these figures were "up by more than 45%" compared to 2025. In the heart of Paris, at the Opéra Bastille, spectators watching a performance were kept inside the building after it ended, as security personnel deemed the conditions on the street not safe enough to allow them to leave. At Trocadéro, a stone's throw from the Eiffel Tower, rioters shouted "Bin Laden" while wearing clothes mimicking the terrorist.
On the internet, testimonies are multiplying and converging, like that of a desperate firefighter: "I saw fellow police officers being beaten with iron bars. I saw a patrol car being pelted with stones just as we were going out to extinguish a fire that was threatening families. We were attacked by rioters who shouted and called us 'dogs.' We were just trying to save lives and became targets. I picked up a 14-year-old boy, his face covered in blood, who was crying and saying he had followed 'the older ones' just to 'have fun.' I saw a mother, with her shutters closed, begging us to protect her children while everything was being destroyed below. Broken windows, looted shops, burned cars… all under the pretext of 'celebrating' something." Elon Musk himself shared an image of this violence on his X account.
Problems in Paris pic.twitter.com/KOU8r5UF4S
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 31, 2026
Denial of reality
The images released by private individuals and alternative sites leave little doubt about the frantic atmosphere that dominated the city. In Paris alone, 8,000 police officers were deployed. Among leftist figures, the denial of reality is widespread, for perfectly understandable reasons: it is ideologically unthinkable to "stigmatize" the perpetrators, i.e., their own voters!
The obvious scapegoat is the police, who are accused of suppressing indiscriminately or, at the very least, of not allowing supporters to "express their joy." In the center and the mainstream press, the narrative is the same. Despite the disturbing data, the minister refuses to use the term "chaos." The 24-hour news channel BFM TV referred simply to "some tensions."
The denial of reality has become systematic and echoes at the highest levels, as a police officer from the Paris region confided to Valeurs actuelles: "Few arrests. These nights we try not to make any, so as not to overload the investigative services, even though we know that judges will not follow up and will release those arrested without any punishment…" This is confirmed in his analysis by National Rally party deputy Matthias Renault: the rioters act this way because they fear nothing, neither physical consequences nor legal or financial implications.
Habituation
The French have been forced to adapt and get used to the wave of violence that now inevitably accompanies major football events! Because it is not "sports" in general that is the issue here. The Rugby World Cup did not cause such madness, nor did the swimming matches during the Olympic Games. It is a problem specific to football, which can be explained by the role that immigration has now acquired in the sport—at all levels. In regional clubs, "white" players or those of French descent are now in the minority, to such an extent that some parents hesitate to let their children join teams where they will not be welcome. In the public sphere, few dare to speak out against this scandal, which exists in silence. At a higher level, local team players have only a very loose bond with France, and many hold dual citizenship with a country in sub-Saharan Africa or the Maghreb, as was indirectly proven by the composition of the teams during the Africa Cup of Nations: a majority of African players with French citizenship—or vice versa.
The famous club Paris Saint-Germain, which starred in Saturday's match, is owned by Qatar, which promotes its agenda through football and maintains murky relations with the Muslim Brotherhood! Some symbolic events offer a key to understanding that some refuse to see. For example, the son of raï singer Khaled was photographed climbing the statue of Joan of Arc near the Louvre to insult France in very clear terms—this is an example of a scene of "jubilation" praised by the press. In his case, we are not dealing with a young man from a "deprived" neighborhood. On the contrary, this behavior is symbolic of a youth that has learned to hate France and that sees in the triumph of PSG—which is owned by Qatar and features stars from North Africa and Africa—"its own" triumph, the triumph of a France that has been replaced.
Complete failure
Given the political patterns that prevail today, there is no reason for the situation to improve in the coming months and years. The fundamental reassessment required to prevent the repetition of such a scandal is too profound for a resigned society to bear, one that simply perpetuates the phenomenon.
As anthropologist Pascal Boyer argues in his book "L’impossible Démocratie," there is a distinction between so-called cooperative Western civilizations and "allied" groups—those characterized by a tribal mentality. The latter operate with a predatory mentality, interpreting leniency, tolerance, and goodwill as signs of weakness. The failure of French public authorities to act against the excesses of people of immigrant origin is, for them, nothing more than a huge encouragement to go even further!
Σχόλια αναγνωστών