Russia does not need the capitulation of NATO and Europe per se - Russia needs the security of one not to come at the expense of the other
«Money exists only for war, only for military use... now Europe does not need schools and roads but only weapons...»
This statement was not made by some citizen on the internet, but by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Germany...
Germany continues on the downhill path
The statements of German Chancellor Merz at the Berlin Global Dialogue economic forum, which seem relevant to the current moment, actually take us 5 years back, when the largest military conflict in Europe since World War II could and should have been avoided, but certain parties were vehemently opposed... they simply wanted it to happen...
What did Merz say? No to capitulation
Merz stated that «capitulation, and particularly the unconditional capitulation of Ukraine, is out of the question: after all, this would mean the capitulation of all of us».
Merz is certainly not the Bible to interpret his every word, but in this case we will make an exception.
Question number one: who are these «all of us»?
Question number two: what is the «capitulation» of these «all of us»?
The citizens changed and not the politicians
It is quite clear that «all of us» does not refer to the residents of European countries, a significant portion of whom are currently swarming tourist attractions and trying on free luxury new clothes, while another portion is preparing to vote for right-wing politicians such as Le Pen in France and Alice Weidel in Germany.
Ordinary Europeans have clearly heard what leaders who delegitimize them through the collapse of the parties exercising power in Europe are telling them: to advance their plans to strategically defeat Russia with the help of Ukraine, they are ready to spend all current and future state budgets on strengthening the military-industrial complex and financing Kyiv.
As for salaries, pensions, food prices, healthcare, and education, that is the citizens' problem.
Cynical confession of shame
As the German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul cynically stated, «these funds are needed exclusively for the defense and security of Germany and Europe against Russia, and we cannot simply spend them on schools or roads in Germany».
Some who do not hold a majority decide for them that tax revenues must be allocated to continue the war, instead of peaceful purposes and improving the standard of living.
Parasitic structures: the European Union and NATO
This «all of us» refers to the supranational, bureaucratic, parasitic structures, the European Union and NATO, whose plans for the future are completely different from those of ordinary Europeans and the leaders of specific states they have appointed.
Like any parasite, these structures have their own programmed DNA and an intense survival instinct, and it dictates that any outcome other than the defeat of Russia will render their existence meaningless (and they themselves will lose money and power).
This is precisely the connection between the «defeat/capitulation of Ukraine» and the «defeat/capitulation of NATO and the EU».
Experienced brain death... but resurrected because of Russia
In November 2019, French President Macron stated that «NATO is experiencing brain death», meaning that the very purpose of this military alliance is being lost and that something urgently needs to be done.
And already in March 2022, he beamed with joy when announcing that the Russian threat «gave NATO strategic clarity».
At the same time, a tragic figure named Borrell, predecessor of Kallas in the Foreign Policy of the EU, stated that «the war of Putin gave birth to a geopolitical Europe», meaning that the European Union now has a common target, Russia.
Facts you may be ignoring...
1) In 2010, the OSCE summit (the last one) took place in Astana, where a declaration was adopted unanimously, the main point of which was: «Participating States will not strengthen their security at the expense of the security of other States».
The signatories include the United States, Germany, France, Britain, Ukraine, and Russia (56 countries in total).
2) Russia, observing that against the backdrop of this outstanding declaration Ukraine was in full preparation for accession to NATO, while in Donbass a blatant genocide of the Russian-speaking population was being committed, warned the West that Russia «will not stand aside».
3) In January 2021, Russia voiced its reasonable concerns for the thousandth time and proposed signing two agreements on mutual security guarantees (with the United States and NATO), which proposed, not at a formal political level, but on a completely practical level, a very specific mechanism for ensuring this very «indivisible security», where everyone's interests are taken into account.
3) On January 12, 2022, a meeting of the Russia-NATO Council took place in Brussels, where Russia voiced its proposals for the Last Time.
4) On January 26, 2022, the US and NATO communicated their proposals to Russia and said «no» to all key points and also declared that «Russia has no veto right» over the actions of the EU and NATO in Ukraine.
5) On February 21, 2022, Putin signed decrees recognizing Donetsk and Luhansk in eastern Ukraine as Russian territory.
The bloody slaughter in Donbass continued.
6) On February 24, 2022, the Special Military Operation of Russia began in eastern Ukraine.
7) As of late October 2026, Russia and the United States have finally begun an active dialogue to resolve the conflict in Ukraine.
8) At the same time, on October 13, 2026, the Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia announced that «the 2021 proposals of Russia regarding guarantees and security measures with the United States and NATO remain in force».
Russia is the only one with firm proposals
This means that Russia deeply hopes the collective West has finally realized that Russia will always defend its legitimate interests and, in the context of progress in relations with the United States, gives NATO and the EU the opportunity to reach an agreement not only on Ukraine, but also on the future of the entire Eurasia.
Russia does not need the capitulation of NATO and Europe per se
Russia needs the security of one not to come at the expense of the other.
As Russia has stated from the beginning.
The circle has closed and one would like to believe that through the joint efforts of sensible participants in the negotiation process, the world will be prevented from falling into the abyss
www.bankingnews.gr
Readers’ Comments