The Eurozone is re-entering a trajectory of dangerous destabilization, as the surge in borrowing costs for France revives the nightmare of the 2012 sovereign debt crisis. Markets are reacting nervously to the French fiscal impasse, triggering a wave of sell-offs that threatens to sweep up sovereign bonds in Italy, Belgium, and Greece.
Confronted with the hazard of a systemic domino effect, Europe faces a renewed existential threat, with all eyes turning toward the resilience of the ECB.
Specifically, borrowing costs for France are rising abruptly, with investors worldwide waking up to the risk of a full-blown sovereign debt crisis in the EU's second-largest economy.
Turmoil across financial markets has begun spreading beyond national borders, intensifying anxieties that political dysfunction in France could ignite a wider, regional problem.
Memories of the sovereign debt crisis that jeopardized the survival of the single currency 15 years ago are beginning to resurface.
France has failed to post a balanced budget for over 30 years.
Since 2019, it has been unable to keep its fiscal deficit within the limits agreed at the EU level, driven by ballooning pension system costs, as well as challenges such as rearmament initiatives and the green transition.
The debt burden of France is now so massive (and mounting so rapidly) that some are beginning to worry the country might not be able to repay it in full.
What happens if French woes deteriorate further?
Is Europe confronting another existential crisis?
Will the European Central Bank rush to the rescue through whatever means necessary? And will that be enough?

How serious is the situation?
Investor anxieties surrounding the fiscal and political deadlock in France have magnified.
For decades, market participants regarded Germany and France as essentially equivalent in creditworthiness: the additional yield demanded to hold 10-year French paper instead of German bunds was measured in marginal increments.
However, following the pandemic and, more recently, after the disastrous political gamble taken by President Emmanuel Macron to call snap elections two years ago, the spread began widening: initially incrementally, and now sharply.
From 0.55 percentage points in mid-September, it had climbed to 1.45 by Monday morning.
It had not stood at such elevated levels since the debt crisis of 2012. In absolute metrics, the yield on the 10-year French bond is hovering near 5%, marking its highest level since 2008.
Concerns are acute enough that the Governor of the Bank of France, Emmanuel Moulin, warned that «everything possible must be done» to avert a debt crisis heading into the 2027 presidential elections.
Did you say the situation is spreading to the rest of Europe?
Well, that is beginning to unfold. France has been an outlier in Europe in recent weeks, yet sovereign bond yield spreads (the risk premiums investors demand for each sovereign) have likewise started widening for Italy, Belgium, and Greece.
There are also indications that markets are turning broadly more negative toward Europe as a result: the single currency tumbled on Monday to a 17-month trough against the dollar.
The movements were abrupt, yet the risk premium remains at thresholds that would not yet be classified as full crisis levels.
The complication is that bond prices, which move inversely to yields, can decline rapidly when investors reassess risk.
The ownership profile of French sovereign debt could also amplify a mass liquidation.

Unlike Italy, where the bulk of public debt is held by domestic investors, more than half of French sovereign paper is in the hands of foreign institutional investors, who tend to head for the exits faster when volatility spikes.
Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management, one of Japan's premier asset managers, announced over the weekend that it had liquidated its entire exposure to French sovereign debt.
In the event of an acceleration in selling (or worse, forced liquidations), the risk of contagion toward other member states of the Eurozone expands further.
Who you gonna call? The... spread busters
The widening of sovereign yield spreads across nations has stirred questions regarding whether and how the European Central Bank could arrest the deterioration.
The ECB's Transmission Protection Instrument (TPI) enables the central bank to purchase sovereign debt on the secondary market to counter «unwarranted, disorderly» market dynamics, but strictly subject to established criteria.
Before the ECB can deploy it, it must judge that a member state pursues sound and sustainable fiscal and macroeconomic policies. For France, this would mandate large-scale fiscal adjustments that would be politically impossible to execute heading into the 2027 electoral race.
«Assistance would likely demand a genuine commitment to stability via fiscal discipline, structural reforms, or both. Securing such backing will not prove politically easy», stated Christian Schulz, Chief Economist at Allianz Global Investors.
Stop (in the name of love for the euro)?
The ECB could also, theoretically, step in by utilizing its balance sheet. Over approximately the past two years, it has allowed bonds acquired during the Quantitative Easing (QE) era to run off gradually as they reach maturity. This has compelled governments to refinance maturing liabilities directly through open markets. This dynamic expands the net supply of paper on the market and exacerbates upward pressure on yields.
Carsten Brzeski, Global Head of Macro Research at ING, argued that the ECB could «temporarily pause Quantitative Tightening (QT) and reinvest maturing paper in its portfolio with flexibility, conveying a constructive signal to bond markets».
This option was also tabled on Monday in an op-ed by Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, former Italian member of the ECB Executive Board. It likewise lies at the core of the appeal made by Jean-Luc Melenchon, candidate of the French far left for the presidency, urging the ECB to place a portion of sovereign debt «in the deep freeze».
What about interest rates?
Should the turmoil affect the wider region, the ECB could also leverage its other primary and relatively blunt policy instrument (policy rates) to suppress borrowing costs, analysts argue.
«Action by the ECB still appears distant, yet an initial step would be to temper some of the interest rate hikes priced in by markets», analysts at Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) recently wrote.
Markets have already markedly pared back expectations for subsequent rate increases, yet ECB President Christine Lagarde took care to leave the door open for further tightening during her latest press briefing. And with Eurozone inflation touching a three-year peak of 3.8% in September, there are limits to how accommodative Frankfurt can become.
What is the worst-case scenario?
As framed by Robin Brooks, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, in a recent post on Substack, the ECB cannot rush to bail out every single sovereign.
«There must be a waiting window, like a debutante at a ball playing hard to get», he argued. «That is the phase we are currently navigating».
Nonetheless, he added that if backstopping France is the sole path to preserving the integrity of the euro, that is precisely what the ECB will do, even at the cost of «sheer horror in Germany and the remainder of Northern Europe».
«I am as worried as Draghi», says outgoing EU financial chief
The EU risks descending into crisis unless the bloc succeeds in revitalizing its economy, which has essentially ceased expanding, warned the top economic official in Brussels following his departure from a four-decade career within the European Commission.
«I am as worried as Mario Draghi», stated John Berrigan in an interview, referring to the former President of the European Central Bank, who had previously warned that Europe would face a «slow agony» without massive capital expenditure of at least 800 billion euros annually to revamp its fractured economic engine.
The public finances of most sovereign administrations are far too constrained to shoulder the bulk of this burden, having deployed massive fiscal outlays to buffer European enterprises and households from the fallout of the pandemic and two consecutive energy shocks since 2022.
The increase in borrowing rates aimed at tackling elevated inflation has ratcheted up debt servicing costs, rendering debt rollover even more punitive for cash-strapped treasuries, let alone in the face of an additional crisis.
Without accelerated economic growth, highly indebted sovereigns will struggle to generate sufficient fiscal revenue to balance budgets without resorting to painful austerity, just as hard-right and eurosceptic factions gain electoral momentum.
«We are trapped in a low-growth equilibrium», Berrigan noted from the 10th floor of the Berlaymont building overlooking the European Quarter, where he has served since 1986.
«And that, at some juncture, will mutate into a stability concern on its own merit».
The Commission tasked Draghi with authoring a 400-page roadmap cataloging policies, initiatives, and structural reforms that the EU ought to enact to turn its stagnant economy into a unified engine capable of competing against economic titans like the United States and China. Two years following the unveiling of the Draghi report, the EU has implemented barely one out of four recommendations.

Concurrently, Brussels has embarked on an initiative to cut red tape and dismantle regulatory hurdles to help companies scale up.
Banks seek to participate, lobbying Brussels to lower capital buffer requirements that, they argue, constrain them from financing Europe's investment backlog.
However, Berrigan cautioned that seeking expansion through the dilution of lending standards could heighten the bloc's vulnerability.
«There is no impression that citizens are lining up outside credit institutions clamoring for access to credit», the 65-year-old stated. Diluting financial safety margins is particularly hazardous when treasuries hold negligible fiscal space to absorb another shock, he warned, because «if a shock punctures the system's resilience, it will propagate across the whole system. There will be no mechanism to soften the blow».
Berrigan, who retired last Wednesday after six years steering the Commission's Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union (FISMA), is no stranger to financial turmoil. A decade after assisting with the rollout of physical euro banknotes and coins across Europe in 2002 (the pinnacle of his career), he confronted a sovereign debt crisis that brought the monetary union to the verge of dissolution (the most difficult phase of his service).
Following the 2008 financial crash, which exposed a toxic combination of sovereign debt, overleveraged banking institutions, and anemic growth, governments across Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain required full-scale rescue programs.
«There were nights where you went to sleep without knowing whether everything would remain intact the following morning», he recounted.
A more hostile world
Europe has navigated considerable ground since the sovereign debt crisis.
Stricter fiscal frameworks, while subject to calibration, have fostered enhanced discipline over public finances. Credit institutions are «far more resilient» relative to 2008, Berrigan observed, following the implementation of rigorous regulatory supervision and enhanced capital requirements.
Dismantling regulations that produce double counting is legitimate, noted the Irish official.
However, paring back commercial regulation will provide negligible relief to enterprises unless the EU builds a liquid capital market where innovative ventures can raise equity financing: an endeavor lacking real traction that the bloc has sought to advance for over a decade.
Otherwise, European enterprises will keep flocking to New York to court capital on Wall Street. Inaction will simply exacerbate vulnerabilities.
«Economic weakness typically marches alongside political weakness, and financial distress follows in its wake», Berrigan observed. Forecasting the next systemic crisis remains far from an exact science: «The constant with crises is that they invariably surface precisely where you are not looking».
According to Berrigan, EU member nations must harness strength through collective action and pursue deeper integration if the bloc intends to offer its corporations the requisite size and operational scale. This represents a demanding endeavor for incumbent politicians amid the surge of populism, which has fortified far-right and eurosceptic parties across the Union.
Regional elections in Germany have seen a sharp surge in support for the Alternative for Germany (AfD), while polls in France position the National Rally (RN) commanding a formidable lead over competing factions ahead of next year's presidential contest.
Whatever the outcome, harsh macroeconomic realities leave governing parties with minimal room for maneuver.
Germany requires structural economic reforms, while France must take tough fiscal decisions to rein in outlays and spiraling public debt.
These economic realities, alongside the emergence of more assertive policy postures across the United States and China, reassure Berrigan that Europe will find its path forward, one way or another.
«The world is now a more hostile place. A place with less order», he concluded. «I always feel that, if the EU did not exist today, we would be scrambling to invent it».
www.bankingnews.gr
Readers’ Comments