The maritime drone detected in Lefkada was not an "unknown object," nor was it a simple remnant of war accidentally drifted by the waves. According to information emerging from the confidential report of the competent Greek authorities, it is a drone of Ukrainian origin, construction, and use, equipped with approximately 60 kilograms of explosive material. In simple terms, a weapon of war has reached Greek shores, regarding which the New Democracy government is maintaining a deafening silence...
And this in itself constitutes an extremely serious development. Not only for the safety of navigation, coastal shipping, fishermen, and citizens in coastal areas, but also for Greece's position regarding the war in Ukraine. Because when a Ukrainian military asset, loaded with explosives, appears in the Ionian, the issue cannot be treated as a technical accident or a "malfunction." It is a political issue. It is a matter of national security. And, above all, it is a matter of involvement. The question is now relentless: how far is Greece willing to go by following the games of Zelensky?
Athens has supported Ukraine politically, diplomatically, and militarily since the first moment of the war. But diplomatic support is one thing, and turning the Mediterranean, the Ionian, and potentially the Aegean into a space for the operational expansion of the Ukrainian war is another. If it is confirmed, as indicated by the report, that the drone was of Ukrainian construction and use, then the case takes on explosive dimensions. Because we are not talking about an innocent discovery. We are talking about a remote-controlled maritime weapon that could strike a ship, a port facility, or—in the most nightmarish scenario—cause human casualties.
And yet, for days, the case remained murky. There was no clear admission that it was a Ukrainian drone. There was no official public briefing with clear answers. The image presented was one of waiting, embarrassment, and careful phrasing. Why? Who had an interest in not saying from the start that the drone was Ukrainian? Why did days have to pass until the image was formed that Athens was proceeding with a note verbale to Kiev? The fact that the report remains classified is understandable for security reasons. But the essence does not change. Greece appears to be facing an incident that reveals how easily the war can cross the borders of Ukraine and appear in Greek seas.
The case does not only concern Kiev. It also concerns the Greek government, which owes an explanation regarding the strategy it is pursuing. Because blind alignment with Ukraine cannot continue when incidents arise that directly threaten Greek security. Greece is not a war warehouse. It is not a maritime corridor for military operations. It is not an extension of the Ukrainian front. And in no case can it be accepted that the Mediterranean will be turned into a testing ground, a route for missions, or a place for the malfunctions of Ukrainian maritime drones.
Information suggests that George Gerapetritis raised the issue with a strict tone to the Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, warning of the dangers created by such a practice. This is the minimum Athens had to do. The critical point, however, is whether the Greek government will remain with just diplomatic protests or if it will draw a real red line. Because the message to Kiev must be clear: no Ukrainian war asset has a place in Greek seas. No operation, no "malfunction," and no excuse can be tolerated when Greece's safety is threatened. Ukraine may be seeking to transfer the pressure of the war to new geographical fields.
From the Black Sea to the Ionian: Ukrainian drone with 60 kilos of explosives and Greece on an orbit of involvement
Zelensky may believe that the more the conflict is internationalized, the more the room for support for Kiev increases. But Greece has no reason to become part of this dangerous equation. The Lefkada incident is a warning. And a very serious one at that. If today a Ukrainian maritime drone with explosives washes up in the Ionian, what might happen tomorrow? Could a similar asset be detected near a merchant ship? Could there be an explosion in a maritime area of Greek interest? Could Greece be involved in a chain of retaliation or accusations without even having chosen it?
These are not theoretical scenarios. They are the real risks when a country lets others pull the rope of war while it simply follows along. Athens must stop hiding behind diplomatic phrasing. Kiev must receive a clear message that Greek territory, Greek seas, and Greek safety are not on offer for war experiments. Support for Ukraine cannot mean silence in the face of dangerous actions. It cannot mean tolerance for weapons that end up on Greek shores. And it certainly cannot mean that Greece will play, without admitting it, in Zelensky's most dangerous game: the expansion of the war. The Lefkada drone is not just a find. It is an alarm bell. And this time, Athens is not entitled to pretend it does not hear.
The timeline
Disturbance was caused in Lefkada when two fishermen spotted a maritime drone about six meters long in the area of Kavos tis Kyras, near the Dukato Lighthouse. The find immediately alerted authorities, as it was not a simple object that had drifted by the sea, but a military-type maritime drone, upon which a cargo of explosives was found. The competent authorities were mobilized to the spot, while the drone was towed and examined by experts. The explosive load was neutralized by a controlled explosion in the sea area of Astakos, while the craft was transported to special facilities of the Hellenic Navy in order to investigate its technical characteristics and ascertain its origin.
From the first moment, the main question was how such a weapon of war ended up in the Ionian. The case remained for days in the shadow of investigations and careful wording, with the Greek authorities initially avoiding the full public identification of its origin until the expert analysis was completed. According to information that emerged subsequently, the report by experts from the Armed Forces and the competent Security services concluded that the maritime drone was of Ukrainian origin, construction, and use. The report, which remains classified, allegedly describes the technical characteristics of the asset, its mode of operation, and its handling, without, however, clarifying with certainty from which point it started its voyage in the Mediterranean.
The case has now moved from the technical to the diplomatic level. The report was forwarded to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and George Gerapetritis informed the Informal Meeting of European Union Foreign Ministers in Limassol that a protest to Ukraine would follow. On the sidelines of the meeting in Limassol, where Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha had also been invited, the Greek Foreign Minister raised the issue both to his Ukrainian counterpart and to the High Representative of the EU, Kaja Kallas. The message from Athens, according to the same information, was that such incidents create serious risks for navigation, coastal shipping, pleasure craft, and citizens in coastal areas. The Ukrainian side, according to reports, allegedly claimed that it has not yet completed its own investigation into the incident, while acknowledging the seriousness of the "malfunction."
www.bankingnews.gr
Readers’ Comments