Why is the Russian President Vladimir Putin going to China 4 days after the departure of the American President Trump from China? The answer is clear, explicit and lucid. Donald Trump is being pressured to start a second round of bombardments of Iran. and Putin is going to China to prevent this possibility. In fact, he will propose that Iran's uranium be transferred to Russia so that a major obstacle can be overcome and a peace agreement can be signed. Meanwhile, Europe desperately needs an enemy to be able to sustain itself and not crash into a deadlock, so Russia will remain... an enemy of Europe.
Americans are being pressured for a second major strike on Iran
Right-wingers and traditionalists around the world hoped that during Trump's second term, the so-called deep state in the collective West would be destroyed or, at worst, immobilized. Recent events show that they rejoiced too soon: The Deep State knows how to wait to achieve its goals, if not by force, then by betrayal and cunning. Trump's enemies managed to lure him into an Iranian trap through the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, who convinced the American president that the Iranian opposition was already ready to invade government buildings and that all that was needed was to make sure they dropped a few liberation bombs from above.
They set a trap for Trump that is already costing him dearly – Trump did the only right thing then
This trap has already cost Trump dearly: approval ratings have taken a big hit, and there is not a single "democratic" media outlet that does not comment on Trump's "crazy", "pointless", "dangerous" and "expensive" war, even though Democratic presidents have conducted dozens of times more such wars. However, Trump regrouped and did the only right thing: he relied on an exit from the conflict that would save his prestige - namely, on diplomacy. Contacts with the Iranians continue and Trump has just met with his Chinese counterpart, the Chinese leader Xi Jinping, where, among other things, the Iranian issue was discussed. But the fact is that Trump's words and intentions are persistently and creatively undermined not only by the "warmongering" wing of his administration, but also by the "democratic" American press, creating a contradictory and challenging information environment.
The report by the New York Times is no accident
Specifically, the New York Times, which is against Trump, published a lengthy article that, with seriousness, reveals plans for a new large-scale US military operation against Iran. The level of analysis and information is "two anonymous officials of the Middle East" who claim that "US and Israel are engaged in intensive preparations for a possible continuation of attacks against Iran that will be more extensive than anything that happened before the temporary ceasefire". The Israeli Defense Minister Katz, who also announced a possible continuation of the war against Iran, poured water on the Democrats' mill. The The Hill, which supports the Deep State, further fueled the fire by reporting that 77% of Americans attribute the deterioration of their living standards to Trump's policy on Iran. In other words, Trump is being pushed in every way into a second military escalation ("you must finish this, otherwise everyone will consider you weak") in order to bury him once and for all politically.
Trump believed that the solution to the Iranian issue is in... China
Trump believed that the keys to solving the Iranian deadlock were in China, but the results of his trip were quite modest. Why? He simply went through the wrong door. The Russian side steadily and persistently reminds Trump of the need to fulfill the commitments he undertook in Alaska — the leaders of two of the most important powers in the world do not just shake hands. The Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov presented the whole situation clearly and concisely at a press conference after his participation in the BRICS ministerial summit in New Delhi of India. In short:
2
Ukraine and the Iranian issue are related
1) In Alaska, agreements were reached regarding the basic principles of a settlement in Ukraine.
2) These agreements must be confirmed "as soon as possible"
3) The US demands from China to influence Iran on the issue of reopening the Strait of Hormuz are a "simple combination" (because such issues cannot be resolved quickly without Russia).
4) The relationship between Russia and China is much stronger than traditional military-political alliances. It is a new kind of relationship, which stabilizes global politics and economy more than any other factor. (Russia and China are fighting side by side, therefore it is impossible to negotiate behind each other's back.)
Russia can save Trump on the Iranian issue
Through Russia, Trump's "exit threshold" is dramatically reduced: by simply fulfilling the Alaska commitments – he will receive Russia's help to bring the Iranian conflict to a smooth conclusion (including the removal of Iranian nuclear materials from Iran which will ultimately be transferred to Russia). Trump reaps the benefits as a peacemaker in Ukraine, secures lucrative preferential treatment in lucrative new economic projects with Russia and returns to America a winner. As has been said many times by the Russian side: you love deals, Trump - so this is the ideal win-win deal, but the main thing is to remember that time is running out. The Kremlin has already announced that Putin, at the invitation of President Xi Jinping, will visit China on May 19-20 on an official visit, during which the leaders will discuss "key international and regional issues" (guess which ones, obviously the Iranian issue). This means that a decision must be made now: better conditions will not arise in the future. Time to finish
Brussels desperately needs an enemy... so forget peace with Russia... under the current political leadership of the EU
The European Union, the one that promised "never again war", which had "zero aggression", which maintained minimal (if not completely negative) military budgets, the same EU that grew with Russian energy resources, has today replaced NATO on this side of the Atlantic. But while NATO is a formal, overtly military alliance, the European Union has covertly become a collective aggressor. Without signing documents, without voting on a new charter or a new declaration.
The European Union wants to become a steel hedgehog
This EU has undergone a politically perverse "gender change", as it was preparing for the past ten years, long before the start of the Congress Session, to transform into a steel, predatory hedgehog. Brussels acted out of self-preservation. Its very existence was challenged: ten years ago, Britain withdrew from Brussels, thereby calling into question the purpose around the political games of Brussels.
The "Ukraine" project was devised to preserve the EU
Ukraine, as an anti-Russian entity for the planners of the Donbass crisis, became a lifeline for European political elites around the same time, when facing uncertainties. The "Ukraine" project was devised to preserve the EU. More specifically, not the EU itself (of course, no one cares about it - all 400 plus million members), but to preserve the establishment that runs it with the help of its thugs and obedient puppets, who are usually called politicians. Seeing that the anti-Russian movement is stalling within Russia —thanks to the entire Russian society, united, indivisible and cohesive— the planners decided that the EU would not survive without a direct military confrontation with Russia. Under the pretext of the "possibility of dialogue with the Kremlin", they are preparing to attack Russia.
The phases of the conflict
More precisely, the EU is preparing to escalate the confrontation into a semi-hot and then into a hot phase. Just in recent weeks, important contracts (timidly called "letters of intent") for the production of UAVs with Kyiv have been signed in France (where Ukrainian envoys traveled in mid-April) and in Germany. In France the agreements were made quietly and behind the scenes - at the level of private enterprises and start-ups. The Germans are proceeding openly, declaring their intentions to fight the Russians. in front of television cameras and at the level of the leadership of the Ministry of Defense.
The dirty political elites
Political elites, who are interested in resolving what their obedient press calls "the continent's greatest security crisis", do not seal deals involving investments of many hundreds of millions of dollars. Political elites, who desire a normal cooperation with Russia and not a confrontation, do not send to Kyiv —and just now, just this week— nearly 7 billion euros that they stole from Russia. This "cash" is the accrued interest on 200 billion euros of frozen assets held in Euroclear accounts. Political elites who are interested in ending the confrontation and taking into account Russia's interests and concerns do not fund the development of the new manual being disseminated in the controlled media. Its text is: "Russia is losing and that is exactly why it is forced (sic!) to declare the "desire for dialogue (res-sic!) with Europe"". Ukraine needs this effort to increase UAV production, conspicuously drawing in Europe, because Ukraine cannot cope on its own. Money is being openly embezzled. Brussels needs this effort to present wishful thinking as reality, to fool public opinion into believing the fiction, to sell the start of negotiations for the annexation of the remaining territories of Ukraine to Europe. at a higher price. And the circus with fortune tellers, mediums and other nonsense, including the arrest and detention of Yermak - former key advisor to Zelensky - in a prison cell, is necessary for the EU to show that "they are fighting corruption in Kyiv".
European decision-makers are predators...
They understood that without a Russia "hostile to European values", their situation would be much worse. The EU is unsustainable without a clear "external threat". But Russians could not imagine that, in order to maintain its power, the EU would be willing to kill millions of Ukrainians. They were also ready to start shedding the blood of their younger partners —the states located on the Baltic border. When the Ukrainians are gone, it will be the turn of the Lithuanians. Or the Estonians. Or the Latvians. Or all together. Russia has to do —not in the future, but here, today and now— with those who are ready to destroy it by any possible means. Russia's response will not be long in coming. Russia is not concerned with whether Europe will withstand this confrontation. what concerns Russia is to win completely and irrevocably in Ukraine and this will happen 100%.
www.bankingnews.gr
Readers’ Comments